Implemented How ochsubscriptions_orders table is cleaning?
- Dmitrijs Rekuns
-
Topic Author
- Offline
Less
More
- Posts: 118
- Thank you received: 7
2 years 6 months ago #2225
by Dmitrijs Rekuns
How ochsubscriptions_orders table is cleaning? was created by Dmitrijs Rekuns
Hi Ruud,
I go to phpmyadmin and investigate what's happening there.
ochsubscriptions_orders has approx. 34 000 entries.
The same amount is in RDSubs table. So, when we migrated, all the data from this table were moved.
The question is: which data are purged via cron on OchSubs side?
I see this one:
Thank you.
Regards,
Eugene
I go to phpmyadmin and investigate what's happening there.
ochsubscriptions_orders has approx. 34 000 entries.
This message contains confidential information
The same amount is in RDSubs table. So, when we migrated, all the data from this table were moved.
The question is: which data are purged via cron on OchSubs side?
I see this one:
- Purge Unfinished Orders
- Purge Temporary Transactions
Thank you.
Regards,
Eugene
The topic has been locked.
- Ruud van Lent
-
- Offline
Less
More
- Posts: 1700
- Thank you received: 110
2 years 6 months ago #2231
by Ruud van Lent
Replied by Ruud van Lent on topic How ochsubscriptions_orders table is cleaning?
#__ochsubscriptions_temp_transaction is purged when configured to do so. It deletes all records older (based on created field) then the configured number of days.
#__ochsubscriptions_orders is purged when configured to do so. It deletes all records older (based on created field) then the configured number of days where there is NO CORRESPONDING record (linked via ordercode) in the #__ochsubscriptions_transactions table
#__ochsubscriptions_orders is purged when configured to do so. It deletes all records older (based on created field) then the configured number of days where there is NO CORRESPONDING record (linked via ordercode) in the #__ochsubscriptions_transactions table
The topic has been locked.
- Dmitrijs Rekuns
-
Topic Author
- Offline
Less
More
- Posts: 118
- Thank you received: 7
2 years 6 months ago #2236
by Dmitrijs Rekuns
Replied by Dmitrijs Rekuns on topic How ochsubscriptions_orders table is cleaning?
Is it a daily cron job?
The topic has been locked.
- Ruud van Lent
-
- Offline
Less
More
- Posts: 1700
- Thank you received: 110
2 years 6 months ago #2239
by Ruud van Lent
Replied by Ruud van Lent on topic How ochsubscriptions_orders table is cleaning?
Yes,
the log file should have the count for the number of entries cleaned / removed
the log file should have the count for the number of entries cleaned / removed
Code:
2022-10-17T22:05:01+00:00 INFO xxx.93.132.30 ochsubscriptions 0 Unfinished orders removed.
2022-10-17T22:05:01+00:00 INFO xxx.93.132.30 ochsubscriptions Temp Transactions purged.
The topic has been locked.
- Dmitrijs Rekuns
-
Topic Author
- Offline
Less
More
- Posts: 118
- Thank you received: 7
2 years 6 months ago - 2 years 6 months ago #2255
by Dmitrijs Rekuns
Replied by Dmitrijs Rekuns on topic How ochsubscriptions_orders table is cleaning?
Hmm, daily cron job shows 0 Unfinished orders removed.
That is strange as we do have much LESS then 34k records in transactions table.
That is strange as we do have much LESS then 34k records in transactions table.
Last edit: 2 years 6 months ago by Dmitrijs Rekuns.
The topic has been locked.
- Ruud van Lent
-
- Offline
Less
More
- Posts: 1700
- Thank you received: 110
2 years 6 months ago #2256
by Ruud van Lent
Replied by Ruud van Lent on topic How ochsubscriptions_orders table is cleaning?
so currently all record in orders table have a corresponding record in transaction table, only the order that do not have a record in transactions table are removed.
The topic has been locked.
- Dmitrijs Rekuns
-
Topic Author
- Offline
Less
More
- Posts: 118
- Thank you received: 7
2 years 6 months ago - 2 years 6 months ago #2258
by Dmitrijs Rekuns
Replied by Dmitrijs Rekuns on topic How ochsubscriptions_orders table is cleaning?
We have much LESS then 34k records in transactions table. So something is not right here.
Records table - 34K. Transactions table - much less then 34K.
Records table - 34K. Transactions table - much less then 34K.
Last edit: 2 years 6 months ago by Dmitrijs Rekuns.
The topic has been locked.
- Ruud van Lent
-
- Offline
Less
More
- Posts: 1700
- Thank you received: 110
2 years 6 months ago #2259
by Ruud van Lent
Replied by Ruud van Lent on topic How ochsubscriptions_orders table is cleaning?
can you provide me a (sql) dump of both tables?
The topic has been locked.
- Dmitrijs Rekuns
-
Topic Author
- Offline
Less
More
- Posts: 118
- Thank you received: 7
2 years 6 months ago - 2 years 6 months ago #2267
by Dmitrijs Rekuns
Replied by Dmitrijs Rekuns on topic How ochsubscriptions_orders table is cleaning?
Sorry I can't, but this query gives 818 records for me:
SELECT o.id FROM `#_ochsubscriptions_orders` o
LEFT JOIN `#_ochsubscriptions_transactions` t ON t.ordercode = o.ordercode
WHERE o.ordercode = t.ordercode;
And ochsubscriptions_transactions has 34 749 records.
SELECT o.id FROM `#_ochsubscriptions_orders` o
LEFT JOIN `#_ochsubscriptions_transactions` t ON t.ordercode = o.ordercode
WHERE o.ordercode = t.ordercode;
And ochsubscriptions_transactions has 34 749 records.
Last edit: 2 years 6 months ago by Dmitrijs Rekuns.
The topic has been locked.
- Ruud van Lent
-
- Offline
Less
More
- Posts: 1700
- Thank you received: 110
2 years 6 months ago - 2 years 6 months ago #2269
by Ruud van Lent
Replied by Ruud van Lent on topic How ochsubscriptions_orders table is cleaning?
Okay so debugged this with my own tables. As it turns out, the query used is returning unexpected results when using the Joomla db loadassoclist method when a value is NULL.
I am not going to dig deeper into why this is happening, this can be related to database version or the way J4 handles NULL values in tables. It is very likely that this also didn't work in rd-subs as that was using the same logic.
In new dev version I worked around the issue by using a different db load method.
On my test setup it works.
I am not going to dig deeper into why this is happening, this can be related to database version or the way J4 handles NULL values in tables. It is very likely that this also didn't work in rd-subs as that was using the same logic.
In new dev version I worked around the issue by using a different db load method.
On my test setup it works.
Last edit: 2 years 6 months ago by Ruud van Lent.
The topic has been locked.